 |
 |
||
|
|
||
Amazon, SpaceX wage war over Starlink's 'Gen2' system Amazon's Kuiper Systems subsidiary and SpaceX are squaring off at the FCC over SpaceX's plans for a "Gen2" system that envisions a massive constellation of heavier, but more powerful low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellites that can be delivered into orbit via SpaceX's new heavy-duty Starship rocket. Boiled down, Kuiper Systems, a unit of Amazon that is developing its own satellite-based broadband platform, has urged the FCC to reject SpaceX's amended plan, which includes two possible satellite configurations. SpaceX countered that Amazon's move is merely a delay tactic designed to hinder competition. In an ex parte filing with the FCC on August 25, Amazon asked the FCC to dismiss SpaceX's Gen2 plan, which include two configurations that each call for the deployment of nearly 30,000 LEO satellites. Amazon argued that FCC rules require SpaceX to settle the details of its proposed amendment before filing its application, not after. "Forcing both the Commission and interested parties to grapple with the interference concerns posed by two separate configurations doubles the technical effort of every operator faced with the task of reviewing the interference and orbital debris concerns raised by SpaceX's amendment," wrote Mariah Dodson Shuman, corporate counsel for Kuiper Systems. "Accordingly, the Commission should enforce its rules, dismiss SpaceX's Amendment, and invite SpaceX to resubmit its amendment after settling on a single configuration for its Gen2 System." Amazon is trying to buy time, SpaceX claims In a response filed on August 31, SpaceX views Amazon/Kuiper's complaint as petty, holding that the call for rejection is really about SpaceX providing "too much information about its next-generation constellation" to the FCC, and an attempt to slow competition as Amazon/Kuiper plays catchup. "Amazon's recent missive is unfortunately only the latest in its continuing efforts to slow down competition, while neglecting to resolve the Commission's concerns about Amazon's own nongeostationary orbit ("NGSO") satellite system," wrote David Goldman, director of satellite policy at SpaceX, calling on the FCC to quickly put SpaceX's application out for public comment. "Amazon's track record amply demonstrates that as it falls behind competitors, it is more than willing to use regulatory and legal processes to create obstacles designed to delay those competitors from leaving Amazon even further behind." Goldman goes on to suggest that Amazon/Kuiper is dragging its feet in providing interference- and debris-related details on its own proposed system, but has been quick to obsess over and object to SpaceX's Gen2 system. "In fact, Amazon has not had a single meeting with the Commission this year about how it intends to resolve the Commission's interference or safety concerns, but it has had 15 meetings in that same span just about SpaceX," Goldman wrote. "While SpaceX has proceeded to deploy more than 1,700 satellites, Amazon has yet to even attempt to address the radiofrequency interference and orbital debris issues that must be resolved before Amazon can deploy its constellation."
Related posts:
— Jeff Baumgartner, Senior Editor, Light Reading
A version of this story first appeared on Light Reading. |
Charter has sparked RDOF work in all 24 states where it won bids. The cable op booked about $19 million in RDOF revenues in Q1, and expects to have about $9 million per month come in over the next ten years.
Launch of 2-Gig and 5-Gig FTTP tiers in 70-plus markets puts more pressure on cable ops to enhance their existing DOCSIS 3.1 network or accelerate their upgrade activity centered on the new DOCSIS 4.0 specs.
Ziply Fiber, an operator that tangles with Comcast and Charter, has launched two multi-gigabit tiers in 60 urban areas, aiming for all markets by Q2 2022.
Elon Musk's nascent broadband will need to radically accelerate the rate of satellite launches – and navigate tricky supply chain logistics – if it's going to come close to fulfilling its global ambition.
MoffettNathanson questions whether mobile operators will have the network capacity and the right business metrics to back their aggressive stance and forecasts for fixed wireless home broadband.
|
|
|
||
